our methodology
Build on psychophysics,
Driven by thermaldynamics.
We decode taste by applying first-principle based methods in our system design.
01
Sourcing

We designed and developed our own consumer-facing data pipeline, 16 taste types & 8 foodie personalities, together with our 3rd party qualitative research partners, we collect structured first-party sensory data at scale to train our AI consumers. By combining gamified incentives, community engagement, and IP-driven avatars, we enable users to discover and own their foodie prodile, while contributing high-quality, self-reported data. With every report is delivered back to the user, all data is collected with explicit consent and handled in a privacy-first environment to ensure both compliance and trust.
02
Modeling

Grounded in psychophysics and aligned with food industry ISO & ROI metrics, we developed proprietary Sensory Power Indices to quantify how individuals and populations perceive taste in both JAR peak value approach and their emotion states mapping. Before predicting acceptance, we measure the intensity and preference curves for key sensory and behavioural attributes; Now, this process is fully numerical, comparable and ready for reporting.
03
Insights

Insights distill high-quality sensory data and external context into decision-ready guidance. At a principle level we map cohort and regional sensory and behavioural identity, quantify acceptance, isolate drivers and barriers, measure momentum, and translate evidence into clear actions for localisation, reformulation, claims, and portfolio moves. Reporting is customisable, privacy-first, comparable across markets, and built to support GTM and brand teams with confidence.
Example insights
Assess market-entry risk for a current formulation in Bangkok versus Tokyo with acceptance forecasts and localisation ranges
Select the winning flavour route for a sparkling citrus RTD with JAR and intensity targets by cohort
Test claim and naming options for a reduced-sugar yogurt among UK families with predicted lift
Benchmark a chili sauce against category leaders in Mexico City to set spiciness thresholds and messaging guidance
04
Intelligence

AI Consumer in TasteNET simulator are trained on proprietary first-party sensory & behavioural data, grounded in real consumer psychology and live market context.
Only by simulating at the individual level (Bottom up) preserving each consumer's full-dimensional taste preferences and state-dependent responses, can help brands to achieve beyond averaged metrics and reach evidence-backed decisions on what to launch, how to position it, and who will actually buy it.
How do we know it works?
TasteNET is validated against 20 industry-standard benchmarks across Exposure, Purchase, Experience, and Advocacy, each grounded in peer-reviewed methodology.
Dual-axis benchmarking
Every simulation is scored on completeness (the breadth of decision factors captured), and accuracy (the fidelity of outputs against ground-truth consumer behaviour). No synthetic data. No averaged personas.
Free from self-report bias
AI Consumers do not modify responses to appear more health-conscious or less price-sensitive. On barrier identification and purchase hesitation, this is a structural advantage over traditional survey methods.

